Disputes Election Results of the Regional Head Election of Pati
regency, Central Java, was held again in the trial in the Constitutional
Court (MK), Tuesday (08/09/2011). Hearings conducted by the Panel of
Judges chaired by Achmad Sodiki, accompanied by Ahmad Fadil Sumadi and
Harjono, scheduled to hear the answer to the Respondent of the General
Elections Commission (KPU) of Pati District, heard the testimonies of
the Related Party, and Evidence.
Responding to the request Slamet
Warsito-Srimulyani (Applicant case Number 81/PHPU.D-IX/2011), Pati
Commission through its legal counsel, Umar Ma’ruf in his exception plead
obscure (obscuur libel). "In the petition, the Petitioner does not
refer to problems associated with its pure PHPU. Postulated is related
to the violations that are structural problems, systematic, and massive,
"said Umar.
Umar also break proposition of Slamet
Warsito-Srimulyani petition on the issue of the minutes of the
recapitulation of the results of Election. Starch Commission has done
his duty is to give a recap of the minutes of the five pairs of
candidates who attended. "Petitioner is present at the recapitulation,
but then not finished already out. So of course we can not provide. Then
we came to the witness stand than the Applicant. Applicants and
witnesses are not willing to accept the minutes of this recapitulation,
"added Omar.
In addition, the Commission also denied the argument
of Slamet- Warsito-Srimulyani quick count conducted on KPU Pati. "What
we do is temporary calculations. And while we do the calculation for 83%
of polling stations, instead of 100%, "said Umar.
Then, issues
related to polling stations in the yard the village chief, Omar explains
the absence of prohibition in this regard. "The existing prohibition as
PKPU No. 72 of 2009 is a place of worship, including the pages is not
justifiable to use as polling stations," said Umar. Starch Commission
also confirmed not aware of any mobilization of civil servants and the
use of State facilities. He said he pleaded not get clarification from
Election Supervisory Committee of Pati.
Internal problems of PDIP
In
the same occasion the Commission of Pati also want to respond to the
request of Imam Suroso-Sujoko (Applicant case Number 82/PHPU.D-IX/2011).
KPU Pati insisted was never going to make a disqualification or abort
candidates Imam Suroso-Sujoko. Commission recognizes the Imam
Suroso-Sujoko is going to candidates who have proposed and registered by
the DPC PDIP Starch at the time of registration dated May 5, 2011.
Then
by the DPC PDIP during repair, replacement with new candidates filed.
This new replacement candidates in accordance with the provisions of
Article 60 paragraph (3) of Law Number 12 Year 2008. "So it must be
understood PDI-P is an internal issue, not a question of the
relationship between the Petitioner and the Regency of Pati," said Umar.
Next
Umar Ma’ruf, attorney KPU Pati detailed their verification stage
chronology of Imam Suroso-Sujoko pair. On May 11, 2011, Umar said, there
are messengers from the candidate pairs will be present to the
Commission, which will complete the files. "But because it is not on
time, then we can not accept," said Umar.
"Because the present is
the Chairman and Secretary of the DPC PDIP Pati District then that we
received the replacement candidate, and this also in the framework of
the precautionary principle we consulted the Central Election
Commission, and the Central Election Commission declared, meet the
provisions in this law , so we implement this, "said Umar. (Nur Rosihin
Ana / mh/Yazid.tr)
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar